Unpopular Fact: Journalist Turned Author John Carreyrou & Theranos Elizabeth Holmes are both Fraudulent & Dangerous
July 15, 2019
Wall St. Journal, investigative journalist John Carreyrou wrote his truth about Elizabeth Holmes & Theranos. Carreyrou’s focus on the image of fraud neglected to expose the truth, or substance behind the fraud. The goal of ethical investigative journalism is to expose & protect the public from fraud that causes potential injury or death that also costs taxpayers billions. Bonus points if the article also helps prevent future fraud.
People who speak or write the truth are often unpopular–I’m cool with it, it’s never been a goal, so it’s never been a problem. Notice the emphasis on the before the word truth. That’s because there’s no possessive ownership to the word truth. It’s a huge #RedFlag warning when someone writes “my truth” or “their truth“. Simply, it’s an abusive a manipulation of the facts while not recognizing the rights of others. Which is why I inconsistently chose to “his truth” in the first sentence for emphasis of abusive behavior.
Carreyrou’s abusive failure to publicly expose the money behind Holmes, the venture capitalists, encourages the replication and rewarding from a secretive group of Silicon Valley VC billionaires. Nameless, faceless, VCs continue committing fraud in the shadows, without shame, remorse guilt or accountability. VCs really should send John Carreyrou a fruit basket for not knowing or reporting what ever industry insider high enough on the food chain already knows:
Fact: Silicon Valley venture capitalists (VCs), startup board members, and their carefully groomed first time CEOs, are not victims of fraud. VCs are the architects of fraud.
The Sociopathic Business Model© Fraud Formula© 2011-2019
As a Silicon Valley, VC, startup, industry insider turned federal whistleblower, I already know it. I suspected it in 2008, federally reported it in 2011, have publicly written about it on this website since 2014 (including Theranos)–all with the goal of helping those outside the Silicon Valley bubble to expose fraud that harms, kills & costs us all billions. Fraud kills. It’s just not financial.
White collar, venture capital funded, startup crime is not victimless. Just ask the hundreds of thousands injured or the families of those who lost loved ones due to medical devices. All of which start out as venture capital funded startups. Just like Theranos.
Most still don’t know that because someone from WSJ decided to make Holmes the image of crime, and so did the VCs, long before Carreyrou did. He played right into their hand. The unethical, parasitic journalist turned best-selling author helped his career while protecting the VC architects of startup crime, while riding the coattails of several known federal investigations.
ICYMI: should someone like this get bail? Epstein intimidation tactics detailed here | Miami Herald https://t.co/3Dd40MQAiz
— julie k. brown (@jkbjournalist) July 12, 2019
That’s not investigative journalism, it’s little more than cutting & pasting government spoon-fed information. Investigative journalism happens before a publicly known or suspected crime or in the case of Miami Herald journalist Julie Brown, after the investigation was already closed. Brown’s excellent investigative reporting re-opened the closed Jeffrey Epstein pedophile case. Brown is a hero, Carreyrou is a parasite.
It’s dangerous when an unethical, image-focused, journalist is more concerned about creating a personal brand with the goal of getting a book deal, than reporting the full story, while falsely creating expert status. Especially when journalistic peers started revering Carreyrou as an expert ultimately promoting not just one fraud, but two. His and her frauds. Here’s a tip for those outside the industry, ethical journalists don’t have agents, entertainers have agents.
Carreyrou’s dangerous & unethical falsehood’s are continually encouraged, replicated & repeated around the world twice over; and, he was rewarded by Penguin Random House, all based on his strongly held opinion, lacking in factual investigative information, which Carreyrou, either knowingly or unknowingly, positioned falsely as fact.
John Carreyrou, who publicly outed Elizabeth Holmes in the Wall Street Journal in 2015 and later wrote a book about the Theranos saga, says, the board “did nothing to verify that her scientific claims were true.”
— 60 Minutes (@60Minutes) May 20, 2018
If we read something enough times, it eventually becomes part of what we think we’ve always known to be true; and, is often repeated as fact, even if it isn’t. Whether it’s an opinion we agree with or a statement that supports a larger already proven fact (Theranos & Holmes = fraud), it’s then woven into our subconscious. This can be both good and or bad. Let’s start with the bad, well because that’s also unpopular; and very, very dangerous.
Fraudulent: Wall Street Journalist, journalist John Carreyrou, turned Penguin Random House author of Bad Blood, falsely positioned Theranos venture capitalists (VCs) and startup board members as unknowing or uneducated victims of fraud, stating the board “did nothing to verify that her (CEO Elizabeth Holmes’) scientific claims were true.”
Yeah buddy, that’s because they created the fraud (Part 2: to The Receipts shows the work). Carreyrou and Holmes will forever be linked throughout history, Holmes as the villain & Carreyrou falsely as the hero. I’m in no way suggesting their fraudulent behavior is equivalent. It also doesn’t mean that Carreryrou’s unethical, half-assed investigative reporting doesn’t get called out for his dangerous lack of understanding of the venture capital funded industry. Or the harm he’s caused future victims by not reporting the whole story.
All whistleblowers and journalists should expect, corrupt CEOs defending their criminal enterprises, to eventually insult and demean them personally, threaten, intimidate, and retaliate, as a means to undermine credibility.
Wait for it…it’s another unpopular fact: Journalists should be challenged, even if, especially if they’ve previously written something that we agree with or liked. Ethical mainstream media journalists welcome and expect to factually defend their work as it only adds to their credibility.
What’s that expression again about the messenger? https://t.co/tOGea2WI1F
— John Carreyrou (@JohnCarreyrou) June 28, 2019
Inversely, unethical mainstream media journalists want encouragement for misleading the public, while taking credit for others work, inserting themselves in the story falsely as an expert with the goal of replicating the story which was published in a mainstream media outlets. Then rewarded with a book deal. Carreyrou’s glib response is so repugnant on multiple levels. His arrogance demonstrates his lack of understanding of journalistic ethics.
There’s a reason every journalist learns in their first college-level journalism course, if not sooner, that a reporter or journalist is never to become part of the story–it taints the truth while crossing ethical boundaries. Carreyrou the journalist, protected by the First Amendment, could have stayed out of the courtroom as a witness in the upcoming DOJ criminal trial against Elizabeth Holmes. Carreyrou the author will undoubtedly be a federally subpoenaed witness for the defense in the case.
Fun fact: if federally subpoenaed, one cannot sit in the courtroom during the trial. That’s going to hurt Carreyrou’s next book deal, which I’m sure he’ll now parasitically mention venture capitalists. Welcome to the party–better late than never.